Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more algesten's commentslogin

I've spent lots of time in India. It's good to learn what the mosquito that can carry Dengue looks like. They are smaller and fly much faster and more erratically than a common mosquito – way harder to swat! If they settle down, you can see white stripes on their long legs and body.

If you notice them, you can sometimes figure out why they are congregating, they need blood and standing still water to procreate.

At one place I stayed, next door there was a construction site where the workers also slept bare skinned at the site. That's the only time I caught it. Another place I stayed was also seriously infested, I couldn't sit outside. I went looking and found two barrels of rain water on the roof, full of larvae. I added a small amount of dishwasher liquid to the barrels, which worked. Mosquitos went away in a few days.


This style of reporting is so irritating. Surrounding facts and statistics in a heart felt drama of suffering and human angle. Of course I feel for Sonja Bingham, but if I'm trying to get my head around the consequences of Harm Reduction, I want facts, statistics clearly laid out with analysis by (named) experts in the field.


I disagree, you need both. Statistics sometimes obscure the reality of what's happening and can't be relied upon in a vacuum. I recently learned about on hn about a story where Amazon's statistics proved that there was no wait time problem on it's phone lines even though it was a common customer complaints. We need a mix of statistical analysis and first hand accounts.

Source: https://www.tweaktown.com/news/95066/jeff-bezos-explains-the...


"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin [0]

(To be clear, I'm agreeing with the point that you need both)

[0] Or maybe not - see https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/05/21/death-statistic/


Get enough first hand accounts and you can do stats!


Call me old fashioned, but I prefer it when web pages open in a web browser and don't pretend to be native apps.


Sometimes, sure. Sometimes not, though. I have a PWA for studying kanji that very much benefits from the increased real estate and more focused feel.

I like having that choice.


You aren't required to install PWAs and can generally keep using the site that created the PWA just fine. PWAs are most often a courtesy for mobile users, not a requirement. Don't need or want that courtesy, don't take it. That you spent time to post here without understanding that is some kind of indictment.


Don’t use PWAs then.


For me the A380 is the most comfortable. I'm slightly scared of flying, and turbulence making the entire plane jump around makes it that much worse. I'm only speculating, but I think it might be the sheer bulk of the A380 making it the smoothest rides I've ever been on.


Flying the A380 doesn't even feel like flying. Even the takeoff roll is sedate.


Agreed, I fly long haul a lot and the A380 is the best. A350 is pretty good. 787 is fine, and 777 is crap.


To protect myself or my company, what about a pihole (or similar) that rejects any TLS connection attempted with certs signed by these root CA?


That's illegal then. But the pihole won't do the trick, you need to remove the mandated certs from your browsers certstore. If these certs are used for legitimate places (e.g. EU or state websites, and I'll bet they will) you then will get a certificate error.

Of course there is still HSTS, but that's not supported by all tech using TLS.


> If these certs are used for legitimate places (e.g. EU or state websites, and I'll bet they will) you then will get a certificate error.

Prediction: If this passes, users having to bypass cert errors will be the new cookie popup.


TLS 1.3 encrypts server certificate, so it will not be possible to filter such connections out using just passive inspection.


Instead of a pihole, you'd run a https proxy that doesn't trust the certs i guess.


Which https proxy you're referring to? HTTP proxies capable of forwarding HTTPS just offer HTTP CONNECT method, which allows client to tunnel regular TCP connection and HTTPS inside it. These proxies do not do anything with certificates.


I love the TV show also. It's just so surreal and dark.


Some brilliant sketches in there.

One of my favourites is the man who attends his own funeral: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HhBkC6B9I2U


My favorite is the detached upperclass parents who didn't notice their child not coming home from school: https://youtu.be/sydPKgC_Or4?t=1137


I like to human think that Garth Marenghi's Darkplace is a spiritual successor of sorts.


> The cabin crew suggested we all go out and club it. I had no option. It was that or one of their B&Bs. I figured it'd be safer on the streets. For the first time ever I saw the Scotch in their natural habitat, and it weren't pretty. I'd seen them huddling in stations before, being loud but… this time I was surrounded. Everywhere I went it felt like they were watching me; fish-white flesh puckered by the Highland breeze; tight eyes peering out for fresh meat; screechy, booze-soaked voices hollering out for a taxi to take 'em halfway up the road to the next all-night watering hole. A shatter of glass; a round of applause; a sixteen-year-old mother of three vomiting in an open sewer, bairns looking on, chewing on potato cakes. I ain’t never going back… not never.


Is that you watching the YouTube video?

https://youtu.be/T8wIgQB9GIA


Yes, lived in Glasgow for 10 years so it’s one of my favourites.


Perhaps moreso Monkey Dust?


I'm a big fan of Monkey Dust, but due to legal complications with the music copyrights, they were only able to release the first season on DVD. Pirating is the only way too watch seasons 2 and 3.


"Caroline af Ugglas, on behalf of ACQ board of directors commented: …"

This is weirdly enough a Swedish singer who had Eurovision Song Contest ambitions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE1Vy5lKuzw

She's part of the Swedish upper class – the Swedish wikipedia page lists her as "baroness" (friherrinna), further accentuated by her name ("af" is the swedish variant of the german "von")


Not the same person. The Caroline af Ugglas on the ACQ board is this person: https://www.acq.se/styrelsen/caroline-af-ugglas

This is the artist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_af_Ugglas


Didn't the Victorians (and people before that) rewrite Shakespear all the time to fit the current vibe?

Roald Dahl also changed his own books so they would stay current.


i feel like there's a difference between the author themselves doing the rewriting (which i'm fine with, because you're essentially just publishing a new edition of your book), and someone else who just happens to own the IP doing the rewriting (which i'm a bit uncomfortable with, regardless of what exactly is being changed).

it's like if a painter adds something to an already-completed artwork that they had painted and then describes the result as a refined version of the painting (fine), vs when someone who just happens to have bought the painting adds something and then argues that the resulting painting is now the "official" version of the painting, while still naming the original painter as the creator (not fine).


>Didn't the Victorians (and people before that) rewrite Shakespear all the time to fit the current vibe?

Yes, and they are now generally mocked by today's critics for doing so.


And then it typically interacts and fails without feedback. I've tried so many times to tell Siri "Send a message to x that I'm 10 mins away", only to realize much later that "message delivery failed".

No clear feedback, a weird timing issues where it just stalls and show the message it' about to send in case it got it wrong.

It's just a terrible UX all around.


I've had to stop using Google Assistant to send messages. It used to ask the user to choose the correct word when it misheard something. Now it just makes a wild-ass guess and sends it on. It's caused me to send some very odd messages to people and/or look like an idiot.


Explains a lot. I remember having truffle shavings at the table on pasta at a posh italian restaurant in the early 2000, and it was reassuringly expensive. Didn't taste of much, I wasn't overwhelmed. A bit earthy, but nothing special. Then I read somewhere that some people can't taste truffle. So I put it down to that.

More recently if I get something that says "truffle", it's this crazy almost garlic style punch (without the aftertaste of garlic). I've been confused why my experience of this changed so much from then to now… should have known I was being scammed!


> Didn't taste of much

Truffles vary in taste and intensity, yet the price will easily be set on classes that ignore the quality of the single tuber. Some may taste horribly - it can happen - and yet be sold with a price following their class (not their individual merit).

I am afraid it is racist: all truffles of the same family are regarded the same by some, in spite of strong individual differences.


I don't see myself going to the effort/expense of having authentic truffles. It's just a very particular mild taste. I think I can do without it.


There's the kicker. Truffles aren't beloved because of their flavor (which is fine), they're beloved because of their rarity and expense, which allows you to signal your social status. They're the diamonds of the food world.


When I was younger I used to believe when people talked about how amazing certain items or experiences were. They were often very expensive, or very hard to get to. I used to believe that they really were such a unique and special experience and that was why people would go to the trouble and expense of having it.

Being older now, I see that the real value in the item or experience was being able to tell me about it. So many things fall into this category, if not completely, at least partially.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: