Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't understand your argument? You seem to agree "we should be breaking JavaScript" but you're against backwards-incompatibility...which is just a way of saying "breaking JavaScript."


I agreed on this part:

> to make people use less JS and simpler JS on their websites




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: