Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Taxing the phone or the company’s margins should have the same effect, right? They’re both costs on apple’s revenue. Barring maybe some enforcement issue or something it makes no difference how you collect it, Apple will pass some of it off to their customers and eat another percentage based on whatever the new cost/demand curve looks like to them.


>Taxing the phone or the company’s margins should have the same effect, right?

Wrong

>They’re both costs on apple’s revenue.

Hardly. Make zero profit and you pay zero tax on that profit.


My argument is that since apple can move the price, if you tax the company they increase the cost of the phone as much as makes sense and eat the rest. If you tax the phone, they leave as much as the increase on the cost to the end user as makes sense and lower the price beyond that, eating it. In neither case are profits or demand going to zero.


>if you tax the company they increase the cost of the phone

Raising your prices in response to not making as much profit as you desired is not often a winning move in business.


And a tax on the phone does this, so they either lower the cost and eat it, or suffer the same fall in demand as when the price of the phone increases to protect their margins.


Perhaps, but a tax on profits does not do this.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: