> No, that wouldn't be OK. But not everything that is not OK is a network neutrality violation.
If you consider browsers an integral part of the internet infrastructure, it is. If not, it isn't. Happy to discuss naming, but it will mostly be useless.
But glad that you agree that Firefox preemptively delaying those sites is not OK.
> If you consider browsers an integral part of the internet infrastructure, it is. If not, it isn't.
No, it simply doesn't have anything to do with whether it is internet infrastructure. Prioritizing stuff according to the user's wishes/under the user's control without price discrimination is not a neutrality violation, even when network operators do it.
> But glad that you agree that Firefox preemptively delaying those sites is not OK.
If you consider browsers an integral part of the internet infrastructure, it is. If not, it isn't. Happy to discuss naming, but it will mostly be useless.
But glad that you agree that Firefox preemptively delaying those sites is not OK.