Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm fairly certain that most of my opening salvos in evaluating the quality of someone's charts come to me from people regurgitating Huff's book.

I'd put it in a class with Fred Brooks; dead obvious, but somehow needing to be constantly re-explained to a new group of people (or the same people at a later date).



>dead obvious, but somehow needing to be constantly re-explained

Because it's not all 'dead obvious', maybe?


"Science is made up of so many things that appear obvious after they are explained." ~ Pardot Kynes, Dune


There's a great book about this, Everything is Obvious (Once You Know The Answer) about how many scientific studies come up with obvious-seeming findings, but if they'd found the opposite, that would have seemed obvious to us too..




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: