Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'll comment a bit here. If you look into prior research, there are a number of papers on sparse representations in APL along with accompanying code in the literature. That's a good starting point.

Additionally, sparse matrices are on the roadmap for Co-dfns in the future, so there's hope for you there. If you have a specific problem that you wish would work, the best thing to do is to make it known to us so that we can actually prioritize it. I think myself and Dyalog often prioritize those things for which we know there are users. If you want to be able to do this stuff, it would be great to get some concrete programs that we can work off of.

Finally, licensing should, IMO, be a non-issue for most people in the vast majority of cases. Dyalog provides some of the best licensing terms that I've seen, and there are already models that scale well both to startups and to existing deployment in large-scale commercial enterprise situations. If something in the licensing terms doesn't seem to work, I would get in touch with Sales @ Dyalog and they will surely be able to work with you to figure out something that would be equitable.

Most people are surprised when they find out how easy it is to move forward with Dyalog on a commercial product, or how readily Dyalog is looking at making things work for customers or people who wish they could be customers.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: