Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Consciouness is the observation of own states, nothing fancy about it. We humans have powerful machines to observe ourselves, our environment, and to "observe" their future states thru prediction. Observing our observability in a recursive way is what give us a feeling of "consciousness". Even some paradoxes, like Zeno's and Supertasks are simple observer's problems.


The notion that we can "observe our own states" does not stand up to genuinely deep insight about our phenomenology. Experienced practitioners in insight meditation have been able to shatter this illusion, and realize that we can only ever observe memories of some apparent "self" - that no real "self" observation of our observability 'in a recursive way' is going on (thus, pithily: "no self"). But of course, they're still conscious!


> we can only ever observe memories of some apparent "self"

To make a "self" we observe too many ideas, these experienced practitioners in insight meditation are simply removing those mental models and observing the simplest states. They are saving a memory of that, so when they stop meditating and go back to observing their "self" they remember they were conscious in a basic observation mode. That's all.


This is called explanation by definition. You can explain anything by first creating a definition you can explain, then just saying this is it.

Your explanation seems to assign non-physical magical properties to 'own state' observation. Why is 'own state' different?


> Your explanation seems to assign non-physical magical properties to 'own state' observation

What magical properties are you talking about? You would need to study electronics and programming to understand what "observation", "states" and "recursion" means, all of those are real concepts.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: