> Because unlike everything else in the body, we don’t know what sort of material explanation would possibly work.
I think that the closest we have to an explanation for something capable of thinking are CPUs and we're just not sure what the right software is to create independent thought.
This might imply that traits like universal computation are necessary (but not sufficient) for thought.
I think that the closest we have to an explanation for something capable of thinking are CPUs and we're just not sure what the right software is to create independent thought.
This might imply that traits like universal computation are necessary (but not sufficient) for thought.