what's funny is you're ignoring what the experimenter himself concluded about the experiments. he concluded that we have free will to veto these choices, its always rich to see his experiments so badly misused.
> he concluded that we have free will to veto these choices
That's circular. The brain makes a decision, then the brain can choose to veto it? Where does the decision to veto come from?
Free will as you're describing is an impossibility: To even come up with the idea of vetoing something, there must be some process in the brain that's started by "something else", and the something else must be also possible to veto ad infinitum.
Think for yourself instead of just accepting what the experimentallist suggests you should conclude.
