Hard reality is that intelligence agencies conspired against the current president of the US with a story of Russian collusion and tried to frame innocents. These agencies have issues, because that was a clear conspiracy.
Journalists can be wrong, but we have seen direct propaganda that mirrors the talking points of some of these institutions. The Atlantic council for example is broad, doesn't mean anything to attend their parties, but it certainly is an influential network that should be put under scrutiny.
Bellingcat did some good investigative work, but is also connected to the Atlantic Council and I think they just look into a certain direction for recognition purposes. In contrast to Wikileaks for example.
The number of associates of the President who have received criminal convictions is remarkable, many of whom have links to Russian economic crime of one sort or another. Are you saying that all these convictions are framed? https://www.axios.com/trump-associates-convicted-mueller-inv...
Association isn't evidence of anything. FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith pleading guilty is and spying did happen, that is quite factual.
This isn't an argument for Trump being a good or bad person, it is about certain intelligence agencies have stifled democratic processes in the worst matter imaginable.
Journalists can be wrong, but we have seen direct propaganda that mirrors the talking points of some of these institutions. The Atlantic council for example is broad, doesn't mean anything to attend their parties, but it certainly is an influential network that should be put under scrutiny.
Bellingcat did some good investigative work, but is also connected to the Atlantic Council and I think they just look into a certain direction for recognition purposes. In contrast to Wikileaks for example.