Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When it comes to track times and races. A win is a win. That is an absolute fact.

https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/bgxie8/electri...

It's also funny how you claim it's PR. When it's actually physics at work when it comes to low center of gravity.

http://www.formula1-dictionary.net/centre_of_gravity.html

http://www.schoolphysics.co.uk/age11-14/Mechanics/Statics/te...



The quote about "exceptional ride due to lower center of gravity and essentially middle engine design" was taken from Tesla PR in the comment I've replied to.

The 0-100km/h times for M3 and Model 3 is 3.9 and 3.2 seconds respectively and, essentially, 20%. The difference in peak torque (helps in acceleration out of corners) is smaller, 550 N/m and 639 N/m, about 11%. Power (helps at high speed) difference also less - 317kW and 340kW, yet Tesla win here too. Model 3 is even slightly wider (2cm, about 1% wider), which should help in track too. And after all that, a whopping 0.1s of win.

Tesla borked their very first Roadster, despite the fact that they had to provide only drivetrain to it and everything else was done by Lotus. The analysis above suggests that they are still do not get driving as opposed to drag racing.


> "exceptional ride due to lower center of gravity and essentially middle engine design"

That is a factual statement! Let me ask you this. Have you driven a decent mid-engine sports car like a Porsche 718 Boxster and a Tesla Model 3 performance? I have. They both handle quite well.

>The 0-100km/h times for M3 and Model 3 is 3.9 and 3.2 seconds respectively and, essentially, 20%. The difference in peak torque (helps in acceleration out of corners) is smaller, 550 N/m and 639 N/m, about 11%. Power (helps at high speed) difference also less - 317kW and 340kW, yet Tesla win here too. Model 3 is even slightly wider (2cm, about 1% wider), which should help in track too. And after all that, a whopping 0.1s of win.

Facts are facts, you can't spin it to suit your narrative. The Model 3 won while being heavier and costing significantly less is impressive. That was also prior to track mode being released and the new high performance package.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXyEgl9rFN4

> Tesla borked their very first Roadster, despite the fact that they had to provide only drivetrain to it and everything else was done by Lotus.

Do you have a background in automotive engineering? Elon Musk and the Tesla engineers said on many occasions, that the original Roadster only had about 20% original parts after they were done with the conversion. They also said that it would have been easier to start from scratch had they known the amount of hard work that had to be done.

> The analysis above suggests that they are still do not get driving as opposed to drag racing.

Terrible analysis. Randy Pobst (look him up) who is well respected in racing would tell you otherwise: https://youtu.be/aywleQX5lyA?t=202

Unplugged Performance Street Tuned Model 3 Beats McLaren F1 - Time Attack at Tsukuba Circuit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2dustv6utY

Tesla Model 3 prevails with two hill climb victories after Pikes Peak crash

https://thedriven.io/2020/09/01/tesla-model-3-prevails-with-...

Tesla Model 3 Performance Tire Rack Hot Lap

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgCf4aos0ZY

Randy Pobst Pikes Peak Hill Climb 2020 (Unplugged Performance Tesla Run)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvZMwiwnLVg

Pikes Peak Unplugged Performance Tesla Day 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q23I3BywBAA




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: