>If you don't feel like doing that, a good alternative is that you should not be definite about any of it.
I can be definite about anything I want. Additionally, how do you know I haven't already looked at the enormous amount of research?
Either way, the research supports my views in a pretty definitive way.
I'm just saying that game genres should cater to the definite biological differences in interests between men and women.
Do you disagree? Fine. I accept your disagreement. Let's agree to disagree and not let this turn into a gender flame war. I'm not going to reply this thread.
I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that if you'd looked at research, you'd know better than to make definitive statements or to rely on your personal anecdotes from toddlerhood.
I was also assuming that you were not actually intending to make inflammatory statements prompting people to correct you (what you are probably referring to as a gender flame war), but from your various responses I am no longer sure that assumption is valid.
It's somewhat ironic that your participation here consists of a) a thread where you strenuously argue that it is not possible to make definite claims of truth backed by science
b) a claim that you know the definite truth about a particular scientific question.
I can be definite about anything I want. Additionally, how do you know I haven't already looked at the enormous amount of research?
Either way, the research supports my views in a pretty definitive way.
I'm just saying that game genres should cater to the definite biological differences in interests between men and women.
Do you disagree? Fine. I accept your disagreement. Let's agree to disagree and not let this turn into a gender flame war. I'm not going to reply this thread.