Another way to read that would be that the S3 API isn't a substitute for S3, and so another company using the S3 API could be fine so long as they don't copy the code for S3 itself?
My impression is that this is probably nuanced enough we need to read past the syllabus if we wanted to really unpack the reasoning. I can't tell which is the key part from which to make an analogy.
My impression is that this is probably nuanced enough we need to read past the syllabus if we wanted to really unpack the reasoning. I can't tell which is the key part from which to make an analogy.