Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So a while ago a i remembered one post from HN, it was some guy crawling google play store and keeping apps that were paid and people used them but had a low rating. He was selling this list, not sure if it was successful but i made something similar and updated

So far checking only 3 marketplaces, my crawlers found so far about 100k apps, the default filters show only the more interesting once (paid and low rating)

Its free.

I will add more and more marketplaces eventually. I will also try to add some social features, like "working as a team on some idea" and posting own ideas, but will see how it goes.

Feedback welcome

EDIT: i just see it on mobile, it does not look ideal. Will need to work on that hm.

EDIT2: just added pagination :), hope it works for you.



> He was selling this list

Can someone explain the value of such a list, am I missing something? Don't get me wrong, your project is neat and I enjoyed looking through it, but I don't understand how anyone would try to sell this or pay money for this.


I guess it could be "here are apps that people need enough to pay for, but have complaints about" in order to develop alternatives?

Maybe these are apps with bad user interfaces or some other issue and it's a list of low hanging fruit ideas?


I've never bought an app that was one-star, but over time many of the really useful apps I used were sold and did one-star kinds of things.

One app kept track of my car info (vin, insurance, mileage, fillups) and was useful. But one day it was sold - uploaded my data and put it behind a login.


"[but] did one-star kinds of things." That is a great line (seriously). I will probably end up working that phrase into something at one point, which is why I have this post bookmarked, so I can "hat tip to m463 on HN" when I do.

P.S. Do you remember the name of that auto app? Name and shame! ;-)


it was gas cubby.

Another app I had that got worse was camscanner - a scanner app that would take a picture of a document and create a .pdf out of it.

It was sold to tencent. The "privacy policy" - when you could access it (broken links) was written in broken english that basically said it did anything it wanted with your .pdf files.

The kinds of documents I would image to .pdf were extremely sensitive personal documents - think w2, documents with SSN, etc...

At least apple notes eventually added a version of camera to .pdf (though it wasn't obvious how to use it when it came out)


Camscanner was one of my favourite apps! I had even paid for the pro version back before it sold. Then when it sold that actually meant nothing, and now I have a "pro" app that is useless essentially.

If anyone has good alternative suggestions I'm open, I haven't tried to look as I don't use it much anymore.


Microsoft Office Lens is free and really good.

You can also do it natively now in iOS Files app and Android's Google Drive.


OK thanks! I will try those out!


The default assumption for many people will be that something which sells, but has a low rating, is a business opportunity.

The real business opportunity is the sale of the list of course. It’s sort of like selling shovels to and booze to gold diggers.


More like selling a map of gold veins to a gold digger in this instance.


ha, hope you are not correct because i wont sell my list :)


As an app developer, I spend a lot of time trying to find the right opportunities for apps to build. I'd happily spend $50 to cut down research time by a few hours.


Do you ever develop apps to solve problems you personally have?


I remember a story on Startup Podcast (by Gimlet media) about an atheist who looked at top 100 apps, and realized that there was an opportunity to build a better Bible app.

So, sometimes market research is very valuable. This risk you have for "solving problems you personally have" is that you can end up trying to build infra tooling like new databases.


>sometimes market research is very valuable.

I agree! I didn't intent to discount market research.

>This risk you have for "solving problems you personally have" is that you can end up trying to build infra tooling like new databases.

...which is great and should be encouraged, if it's enjoyable! I was thinking more along the lines of an app store ratings scraper


Yeah but I got tired of making things nobody else used lol


thx i keep it free for now


If it's worth planning your business around, it's worth paying $5 for.


nah i keep the list for free :)


> Can someone explain the value of such a list, am I missing something?

You can glean information about your competitors’ usage and advertising, which can help you optimize your own app’s advertising spend.


The strategy is to take one of these apps and build a better version of it. The market demand is there, validated through purchases. But the market is unsatisfied with the current solution. So if you can build a better solution then you have a well defined valuable product


Learn marketing from these guys who can sell mediocre product.

Also, some might sell because their App resembles something popular so some users buy by mistake. Then make sure, it does not parasitise on your app!


well not sure if there is money in it, like said i cant tell if that guy with that list managed to sell anything :D

I dont think i will put on a pay wall, i will rather try to build a community.


I just tried to add G2 to my list but they immediately get you on captcha, so they really dont wish to be crawled :D


Perhaps also keep a list of people who are currently implementing improved versions of these apps, to minimize the possibility of redundant work.


yeap this is a social feature i will work on, actually thinking more about collaboration rather than competition but will see.


Thanks for sharing this! Great idea!

Q: How do you evaluate if the apps are still being paid for?


good question, i cant tell how many people did actually pay and when was the last time someone did. I guess its up to you to do the research further. One can at least often see when the last comment was posted.


Do you know if scraping this data violates their ToS?


Even if it is, it doesn't matter. The US Court of Appeals created precedent that allows for the scraping and aggregation of publicly published information with that LinkedIn case.


Got a link for this? Could open up some possibilities.


Here's the actual case:

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/17...

There is an attached PDF with the full decision, Pages 27, 28 on reference some related cases that informed the decision.


> publicly published information

Is Apple’s iOS App Store “public” though? Ostensibly it’s only open to Apple customers with an iOS device: accessing App Store pages in a web-browser just redirects you to the App Store.


> accessing App Store pages in a web-browser just redirects you to the App Store.

Not if you are on an non-Apple device. Or access an iOS App Store page from a Mac. The pages show just fine.


Google's entire business is scraping websites


Maybe that’s a reason to not feel bad if it violates the TOS but there are real consequences to doing so so perhaps your response isn’t that helpful.


>but there are real consequences to doing so

What consequences ? Breaking ToS can get your account suspended if you even need an account for doing this, not sure what else breaking the TOS really implies.

I don't know if Google can claim ownership of this data as it's customer generated and publically available.


If anyone really wanted to stop you, they would put up an anti scraping mechanism like Imperva and not even bother with legal action.


But mostly people are old or don’t care about solutions when they are too busy so it’s easier just to throw money at a lawyer and cause you trouble.


Shouldn't that be caught by anti-trust laws? Google does not pay websites for scraping, so anyone should be entitled to scrap Google to their hearts content.


Websites can choose whether to be scraped or not, and google respects that choice


To be fair if being scraped were opt-in (Robots Inclusion Standard?) instead of opt-out, we might have a completely different technological world. Who knows.


By creating an account and using their webmaster tools giving up even more of your data?


No you just have to put a noindex header on requests to your website


So they still can use up my resources?


How can they know without looking? Again, you could also use the webmasters tools to block it...


Robots.txt can accomplish the same thing which means they periodically grab a single text file from you.


> robots.txt can accomplish the same thing

Not exactly - robots.txt will prevent Google from crawling the page but it might still show up in search results (without a snippet or your page title) based on how others link to it.


How dare they!


It's nice of google to respect the choice to effectively become undiscoverable to anyone searching for your product.


You sound like you have a third opinion, one which would allow a website to appear on Google in response to user searches without Google knowing anything about what the website contains?


No, they are sarcastically indicating that you don't really have a choice, because if you aren't indexed by Google, practically speaking, you might as well not have a website.


Sure, but they don't scrape anyone who opts out


In the US, there was a ruling a couple of years ago that gives some legal clarity to scraping data made publicly available (in favor of the scrapers) in the hiQ vs. LinkedIn case. You can read more about it here https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/09/victory-ruling-hiq-v-l...


Dunno about Atlassian and Shopify, but I can’t imagine Google launching a case against someone for scraping them.

I guess robots.txt is all that really matters.

Here’s Play Store’s: https://play.google.com/robots.txt


This data is quite valuable and services like this aren't competing with these app stores. If anything, they are probably inviting more competition to the app stores resulting in better apps.

There is no reason for these companies to go after some small guy scraping the app store data. But who knows - Craigslist went after one man shops. These companies might too.


agreed, provided the crawler complies with robots.txt


hm not sure how/if they will react if this blows up but it wont stop me for now.


Will the scraper code ever be open source?


Cool idea. I’m not able to find some well-used apps with the search, like Headspace. So as we say, it’s about the execution.


Headspace is there, but you need to set the filter to 0usd min (the app is free) and max rating to 100 (the app is rated 92%)


hmm, interesting... my search term was "meditation"


hmm shame, maybe remove some filters, maybe there are no hated apps like that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: