It may be ignorance. It may also be intentional, glossing over the difference in order to try to weaken opposition to ESC research.
Either way, it's an unfortunate blot on an otherwise solid article covering a tremendously interesting piece of news.
It may be ignorance. It may also be intentional, glossing over the difference in order to try to weaken opposition to ESC research.
Either way, it's an unfortunate blot on an otherwise solid article covering a tremendously interesting piece of news.