Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You didn't have to give your fingerprints when you got a driver's license?


Where on earth would people accept such an encroachment on their privacy and right to unreasonable search and seizure just to obtain proof they have passed an examination? Soviet Russia? The DDR? Orwell's Oceania?


It isn't just proof you passed an exam -- it's also your ID card. The fingerprints are part of your government ID. Here in California you have to give a thumbprint or fingerprint to get both a license and a state issued ID card. The license serves as both proof of passing and as an ID so you don't need two cards.


Here in California everyone who has a driver's license had to have a fingerprint/thumbprint taken.


No, never. I’ve had licenses in FL, GA, NC and CA.


They for sure took your fingerprints in California. It's required to get a license.

Search this for fingerprint: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/file/california-driver-handboo...

You may just not remember because it's electronic.


And it was 20 years ago...


I got my license in California in 1993 and it was required then too. I remember because we made fun of how the driver handbook said, "you must provide your thumbprint, or your fingerprint if you have no thumbs".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: