Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Any good reasons to select Pop over Ubuntu?


Here's a few:

- Great initial repo list

- Togglable tiling manager

- Excellent shortcuts for everything that improve my workflow

Sure, I could get all of this stuff and more working on any other distro, but this stuff works out of the box, and is stable.


Is there any way to use Pop without the gnome backend? Gnome and Pop both ship with Nautilus, and apparently don't work well without it, but Nautilus doesn't have type-ahead navigation. This is when you are in a directory and start typing the first few letters of the file you want to get to. In Windows Explorer, that will just lead to the cursor skipping ahead, whereas in Gnome, this starts a search for the file. It's absolutely appalling behaviour, and the developers are obstinate to a fault at changing this, despite outcry.


Yes. I use Pop!_OS with Plasma, it's great. The documentation includes details on switching to 8 different desktops.

https://support.system76.com/articles/desktop-environment/


I had the same issue and resolved it on Pop! OS with this patched nautilus from a PPA.

https://launchpad.net/~lubomir-brindza/+archive/ubuntu/nauti...

Works great for me!


Oh hell yes. Thank you! I think it's time to give Pop a chance again then!


Thanks a lot for the list. "Luckily" not deal-breakers that would warrant a shift for me. I have been using Ubuntu without any complaints as daily driver for a year or so. But as I plan to get a new laptop in the future I contemplated whether I should try a new distro as well.


There are other reasons but for one Pop doesn't push Snap. Flatpak is available and well integrated, but isn't forced down your throat (as Snap is in Ubuntu).


I generally prefer flatpak but I feel snap is a bit ahead and for one simple reason: marketing.

Canonical has been pushing very hard for snaps and it shows when I get get official builds of things like Zoom, Visual Studio Code, JetBrains and Spotify but the flatpak versions are just community provided. Some of them tend to work better than flatpak as well because of “classic” confinement. Using VS Code in flatpak and not having full access to the system in my integrated terminal kinda sucks. It might not be better from a security perspective but it’s much better from a user experience perspective and that matters more to me personally.

The said I still use flatpak as well, and prefer to use flatpak if there isn’t a material difference in functionality between the snap and flatpak.


Nvidia out of the box.


Ubuntu has had the proprietary nvidia driver on the iso and selected out of the box for a few releases now.


NVIDIA Optimus support - out of the box with a UI to switch graphics cards. The only other bistro I have seen to support it is Ubuntu MATE. All other distros require installation outside of the default package managers.


> The only other bistro I have seen to support it is Ubuntu MATE.

Rarely have I come across an eatery that serves IT.


"bistro" and "MATE" make for an interesting typo.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: