> Why not read the linked paper,

You answered your own question. The answer is in page 12, which means there is too much information. He is not interested in the whole topic, just about this question. So he asks, maybe someone is charitable enough to answer. Nothing wrong with it.

Skim until you are in the right section?

Literally titled: "Section II - Mitigation of bitsquatting attacks"

How could I possibly answer their question better than the experts who wrote the paper?

Maybe you can't but someone else can. The question is open to anyone who can and wants to answer.

But the answer is right there, section 2, starting on page 12 of the linked paper.

We're hackers. Autodidacticism is our creed. Research papers are our bread and butter. Why settle for speculation from the pseudonymous masses when a rich vein of well written analysis by reputable authors is one click away?