Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Agreed on all counts. The “falsehoods programmers believe about X” articles are cautionary lists of edge cases to think about, with an unfortunately aggressive naming scheme.


They should really call these lists "Incorrect assumptions programmers make about X" or: "Test cases programmers should test their software against"


Or “boundaries users have to stay within”. I’m aware of a lot of edge cases. When you start building with those in mind, it adds complications. Extra steps or more UI or whatever, to ensure the “right” thing happens, assumptions are obvious, etc.

More often than not I’m pushed back in with “that doesn’t happen” or “don’t spend time on that”. “We’re never open past 9, don’t worry about a day” but then they acquire a system in a different time zone and … boom. Things are broken.


Falsehoods programmers Considered harmful




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: