Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From what I understand:

Meta has Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and others.

When Meta tells law enforcement that user xxxBobTerrorist69xxx is a terrorist based on information they have from their apps, law enforcement listens. They can also ban that person from all of their platforms. These platforms are used by content creators for findability, just like any business.

If the only place you can advertise is your own platform, how are you going to draw people to your platform.

The plaintiffs are arguing that OnlyFans used connections to Meta executives to then have them use their position to lock creators on competing platforms out of important advertising platforms.

So far, it seems like Meta itself isn't the issue here, it's people who work for Meta. Which is a little hair-splitty considering some of the people involved. But if Rob Walton is caught snorting coke off of a hooker's ass, we don't say "WalMart" is doing it.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: