Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

OpenOffice isn't dead, they made a release a few months ago this year.

https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing-apache-openoff...

Last commit made 3 days ago, actively maintained.

https://github.com/apache/openoffice



https://itsfoss.com/libreoffice-vs-openoffice/

> Technically, both receive regular updates. But, OpenOffice is limited to bug fixes and minor updates.

> LibreOffice has more development activity, frequent bug fixes/minor updates, regular major upgrades with newer features, and improved user experience.

Apache can do whatever they want here, but the project is limping at best.


So you went to github and saw commits made 3 days ago, then concluded that surely that means the project isn't dead. It is though, you're just completely missing the forest for the trees - a typical trait of programmer types.


It isn't though until they say it is discontinued.

You also missed that OpenOffice made a new release and they were even bothered enough to make a post about it. Hardly a trait of dead software.

As much as you would love to say it is dead:

It officially isn't and it is still maintained.


c. 3 commits per day from one contributor? That's dead, compared to Libreoffice that has dozens per day from multiple contributors.


By that logic, projects like the Bohem GC is dead with only one full time maintainer.

https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc


If that were a project that needs to change as much as a full office suite, then yeah. It's not so much the absolute numbers as much as the relative numbers when compared with the amount of activity in Libreoffice.


A long way to admit you were wrong but ok?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: