Yeah it makes sense they don't want unions, but that's not the point of it. Anti-union behavior is still mostly illegal, isn't it?
There's a difference between expecting companies to help unions vs actively engage in shady behavior to avoid them.
In this case, we're describing what I consider a loophole, but it's still wrong (even putting aside the morality of it).
OP said the framing was weird, but expecting companies to not be that shitty is perfectly normal in my view. After all, we sometimes forget that at some point a human decided this was the right move.
The alternative is to normalize it and assume every company is the shittiest possible. On second thought that might be a lot closer to reality though.
There's a difference between expecting companies to help unions vs actively engage in shady behavior to avoid them.
In this case, we're describing what I consider a loophole, but it's still wrong (even putting aside the morality of it).
OP said the framing was weird, but expecting companies to not be that shitty is perfectly normal in my view. After all, we sometimes forget that at some point a human decided this was the right move.
The alternative is to normalize it and assume every company is the shittiest possible. On second thought that might be a lot closer to reality though.