Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's clear that they feel that way also. The engineer Andreas Spiess recently appeared in a briefing on dangerous, anarchy-enabling technologies simply for making a youtube video on an encrypted messaging protocol over lora mesh networking.

They're carefully watching and cataloging any communications technology they can't compromise.



It's also hard to distinguish between legitimate security threats and scare tactics designed to make us think we're in danger. Remember the Bloomberg Supermicro "bombshell"[0]? I still don't know if that was ever confirmed true or false, but to my knowledge Bloomberg never retracted it.

[0] https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/12/supermicro_bloomberg_...


I still believe it. Wouldn't surprise me if ASPEED were a "SIGINT enabled" vendor as well. It would be foolish not to target the most widespread BMC platform.


The guy with the Swiss accent?

What's your source on this?



Which briefing was that? Edit: it appears to be this https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-White-Pa... ("Network-Enabled Anarchy: How Militant Anarcho-Socialist Networks Use Social Media to Instigate Widespread Violence Against Political Opponents and Law Enforcement" via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAQI2ZSmxPU; thanks to a sibling comment)


TBF that same tech would probably be great for them or militaries to have.


Well advertising is a form of psychological warfare.


The guy's video was linked to from /r/SocialistRA and a screenshot of the link was included in a paper about "How Militant Anarcho-Socialist Networks Use Social Media to Instigate Widespread Violence Against Political Opponents and Law Enforcement." The paper never mentioned Spiess or meshtastic. What are we supposed to infer from that?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: