Having used php and run across many if not all of the issues the article lists personally I can pretty confidently say it's as close 1o 100% correct as anything I've read on the subject.
The article lists "E_ACTUALLY_ALL" as if it's really a PHP constant. I'm not sure the author has even used PHP -- this is just a bunch of information culled together from different blog posts with very different levels of understanding. There are many things that are just factually wrong with it.
I could complain about PHP all day but at least I know what I'm talking about!
really? that's your example? I read that constant name very clearly as "snark". If that's the best you can come up with then I think you just made my point for me.
