> I've been using this site since 2008. This is my second account from 2009.
I did not really like HN back in the day because it felt too startup-y, but maybe I got a wrong impression. I much preferred Ars Technica and their forum (now, Ars is much less compelling).
> For me as of late I've come to realize that the current audience wants YATNE more than they want deep discussion here and so I modulate my time here accordingly.
I think it depends on the stories. Different subjects have different demographics, and I have almost completely stopped reading physics stuff because it is way too Reddit-like (and full of confident people asserting embarrassingly wrong facts). I can see how you could feel about fields closer to your interests being dumbed down by over-confident non-specialists.
There are still good, highly technical discussions, but it is true that the home page is a bit limited and inefficient to find them.
I did not really like HN back in the day because it felt too startup-y, but maybe I got a wrong impression. I much preferred Ars Technica and their forum (now, Ars is much less compelling).
> For me as of late I've come to realize that the current audience wants YATNE more than they want deep discussion here and so I modulate my time here accordingly.
I think it depends on the stories. Different subjects have different demographics, and I have almost completely stopped reading physics stuff because it is way too Reddit-like (and full of confident people asserting embarrassingly wrong facts). I can see how you could feel about fields closer to your interests being dumbed down by over-confident non-specialists.
There are still good, highly technical discussions, but it is true that the home page is a bit limited and inefficient to find them.