The baeldung article is just wrong
> The client, in turn, receives the delayed ACK and assumes that it refers to the last sent SYN message
ACKs have acknowledgement numbers, so this sort of confusion can not happen.
The baeldung article is just wrong
> The client, in turn, receives the delayed ACK and assumes that it refers to the last sent SYN message
ACKs have acknowledgement numbers, so this sort of confusion can not happen.