You could perceive (maybe? Depends on how it's hooked up) a future (a simulation based the information you have), but there's no reason to think that's what the future is with certainty. Map/territory stuff too.
You can certainly predict portions of it (1=1 will continue to be true indefinitely, and that's just one example).
And, there is no need for predictions to be true, or claims of fact about whether there are or are not "reasons" for things. In fact, epistemically unsound claims such as this are very often the only type of speech ~allowed, as crazy as that may seem.
I don't see how what you're saying lets you "perceive the whole of the future in one gulp", or maybe it does, but you can't be confidant that it's the real future.
