To not fall under ,what is criticized by some people here, as making an ad for a competitor - but big parts of it are very similar to a project im working on for multiple years now, i not gonne name or link the project i gonne mention.
While my project is not meant to be specifically used with LLMs, what i build (or am building) is a system which has no specific defined sequence, but is rather a composition of "actions" of which each of them has a specific defined requirement in form of a data structure that is necessary to execute the "action". I build it in a way to be self supervising without one single task scheduling mechanism to enable people to write data driven applications.
Its nice to see that im not the only one (ye i didnt expect that to be the case dont worry im not elon-musk crazy) that tries to go such a way.
While i build it for completly different use cases (when i started LLM weren't such a big thing as they are now) its definatly a cool and creative way to use such an architecture.
While my project is not meant to be specifically used with LLMs, what i build (or am building) is a system which has no specific defined sequence, but is rather a composition of "actions" of which each of them has a specific defined requirement in form of a data structure that is necessary to execute the "action". I build it in a way to be self supervising without one single task scheduling mechanism to enable people to write data driven applications.
Its nice to see that im not the only one (ye i didnt expect that to be the case dont worry im not elon-musk crazy) that tries to go such a way.
While i build it for completly different use cases (when i started LLM weren't such a big thing as they are now) its definatly a cool and creative way to use such an architecture.
Gl hf :) and thumbs up