I will often have a few chats going for a project, but with different contexts. For example, one might be tech focused, another marketing focused, another with some context on my personal goals, etc.
So I will take the same question and feed it into the chats with differing context. It is almost like having different perspectives on the same problem. And the conclusions can often differ based on the differing contexts.
This is how I’ve been using Gemini and it’s the first time I’m really seeing consistent value.
I’ll get a context into a solid place with as much information as I can about a project. Usually getting up to 100k tokens.
Then I ask it to give me a summary I can use in a fresh chat, that will maintain the current context. This lets me reclaim space, bring responsiveness back to sane levels, have a baseline chat I use to spin up branches for marketing, design (it’s pretty helpful at trouble shooting Substance Designer graphs), etc.
I’ve found myself going into sub branches from there… like a marketing context that pushes branches into different marketing channels.
I will often have a few chats going for a project, but with different contexts. For example, one might be tech focused, another marketing focused, another with some context on my personal goals, etc.
So I will take the same question and feed it into the chats with differing context. It is almost like having different perspectives on the same problem. And the conclusions can often differ based on the differing contexts.