Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Some of those sophisticated investors are also engaged in shameless capital extraction. Their investment thesis is based on the "Greater Fool Theory": they're gambling that they can dump the inflated assets on another bag holder before it blows up.


To be fair that theory works handsomely.


But they might end being the bag holder themselves. And is the reputational risk worth it? I would say - no.


> And is the reputational risk worth it?

Yes! The only metric that matters is assets under management, since that’s where funds take their cut. Nothing else matters.

A16Z used to be a respected investor, then they went crazy deep into crypto scams and their AUM exploded, so they made more money than ever before.


Reputational risk is dead. All publicity is good publicity, the alternative is obscurity aka being a loser




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: