Even with search grounding, it scored a 2.5/5 on a basic botanical benchmark. It would take much longer for the average human to do a similar write-up, but they would likely do better than 50% hallucination if they had access to a search engine.
Training for tasks still works petty well, but “vision” is a super broad domain and most seem optimized for OCR and screen processing (which have verifiable outputs and relatively straightforward data generation)
