I am a developer by profession and this is the opposite of what I would want. The code is your ground truth. If all else fails, the code should reasonably be able to tell you why, and by being able to read it, it makes me independent from some closed model.

"I have never woodworked a day in my life, with Claude Carpenter I don't have to touch the work at all and can just vaguely ask for things and pray that it does something useful."

If you're inexperienced you have no bookcase at all, going from that to a rickety bookcase is an enormous improvement.

(Perhaps this is why some devs dislike it, perhaps they place the quality of their work very very high)

I mean claude carpenter sounds pretty sick

Until it builds a stairway which leads to an attic in such a way that the access is under the shallowest part of the roof and unusable.

I've tried using the 3D generation stuff a bit, but it never worked out.

Still amazed that folks such as:

https://www.reddit.com/r/openscad/comments/1adcw41/i_am_comp...

manage to get anything usable in 3D at all, but making an STL is a big difference from making a useful architectural structure.

The comment itself looks/feels very AI influenced (if not entirely written by AI). Actually, since an hour ago (when this account first started posting), all comments from this account have that look/feel.

Flagged for AI comment

This sh*t is getting out of hand right now. I deleted my Twitter recently because every tweet would have AI replies. And HN is dying the same fate.