That's not what it's about. In the case of Billy Bragg, it is he who's trying to control Google's content. In the case of that Guardian piece, there's a fundamental lack of understanding about Google's role. Google is the lifeblood of content providers. If you write an article and nobody can find it, does it really exist?

> In the case of Billy Bragg, it is he who's trying to control Google's content

Except that it's not google's content, is it? It's content that's owned by the songwriters, as google themselves acknowledge. Why is this so difficult to understand?