Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>If people searching for Southwest Airlines on Google aren't ending up on the Southwest Airlines website without a huge great banner ad (despite it being ranked at the top of the results) then something is going badly wrong on the Google search results page.

Or maybe they are, and this is simply an example of a branding bonus/partnership for big spenders. We have no idea what the economics are and why.



Many companies also spend serious money to buy the topmost text ad for searches on their own brands/URLs. Even when they're #1 organically.

What branding benefit can there be in showing a text ad to a user who is already searching for your website?


I know little of that business, but isn't that just "if we buy that space, none of our competitors can have it"?

Also, they could better point customers to special offers, etc.


Yes, in media buying, this is known as brand protection. It ensures that customers who already are searching for your brand and are therefore more likely to convert don't disappear off to a competitor.

Hence ironically companies will often pay more per click for these results than on more unrelated keywords.


When this happens I like to play a little game. If I think the company has loads of money (Apple, Shell), I click the sponsored link and help fill the coffers at Google. Otherwise, I click the search result and save the poor struggling company some cents.


What does this achieve? You're transferring an infinitesimal amount of money from, say, an Apple, to Google.

In turn, Google becomes even more of a monopoly (because previously organic clicks now become paid).

And the money Apple paid Google to win your click will need to come from somewhere. A reduction in some other head (organic optimization?) or from increased prices. We'd like to think it will merely reduce Apple's profit margin, but I doubt it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: