> at least I've used the things I'm talking about instead of spreading weird FUD.
> A lot of JSON becomes pure noise: "{{[[{[{{[".
Pro-tip: if you are going to call someone out for not knowing a format and spreading FUD, don't post things where you do the same exact thing. It pretty much invalidates the criticisms you've been making as it says "I don't know what I'm talking about, here is proof."
That'd be cute if what I said there didn't come from experience, even if I did exaggerate the specifics.
Yes, the specific sequence of tokens is not valid because a list obviously can't be a key. The idea is still the same. I'll fix it so it is a valid sequence of tokens that's just as confusing: "}}}]}]}}"
honestly that's a code smell in any data serialisation notation. if you really did have a data structure like that it would manifest in yaml as an indentation 32 space characters. If you adhere to the 78 column rule, you've squeezed most of your data to the right of almost half your screen.
Anyways, invisible syntax errors still suck. At least with json you can (eventually) figure out your braces are unbalanced. Or use a syntax highlighter to spot the problem. No syntax to highlight if you have a problem with yaml.
> A lot of JSON becomes pure noise: "{{[[{[{{[".
Pro-tip: if you are going to call someone out for not knowing a format and spreading FUD, don't post things where you do the same exact thing. It pretty much invalidates the criticisms you've been making as it says "I don't know what I'm talking about, here is proof."