Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Defenders of jargon usually pick examples in which a better substitution would be hard to find, yet unnecessary jargon abounds. Then there's necessary jargon but which is in conflict with jargon from another field. Sigh.


I have as much of an instinct to dislike jargon as anybody, but when I am writing code (in Haskell usually,) I find that naming things proc, process, process', preprocess'', etc., to not be any less confusing...

So there is a certain usefulness to it, and I comfort myself by knowing that our words are mostly all arbitrary anyway.


In my opinion Haskell is horribly jargon-heavy. Its syntax is a disaster.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: