"Why do you feel social media is any less shackled than mainstream media?"
I don't. I said roughly the opposite of that; I've said that despite mainstream media losing its stranglehold on how people get their information, there still seems to be an effective method of controlling messaging.
All I said is that while it does still seem to be controlled, it is not "mainstream media". Nonetheless, I said that it seems like I agree with you, generally speaking. I think maybe we've gotten off on the wrong foot in this conversation; I feel like you're hearing a much more argumentative tone than I believe I'm projecting.
My disagreement (mostly) was with the comment I originally replied to, that asserted that policing, as it is practiced today, isn't a serious problem (which I disagree strongly with) and that mainstream media is the real problem (which I am somewhat in agreement with, but I think it's a more complex conversation than saying, "mainstream media is the problem").
Edit: And, on the "reply to deleted comment" thing, the comment existed when I wrote my comment. I believe I quoted enough context to continue the conversation. While I appreciate the sentiment of not starting flame wars, I didn't intend to start one with my comment; I was sincere in my desire to be concrete about what I was talking about when I say that social media can seemingly propagate an approved message as effectively as a well-behaved mainstream media.
I'm sorry you had to spell it out for me. I suppose I wasn't thinking clearly at the time. Apologies.
And I apologize for my general tone in my response. I made the mistake of writing it before attending to something, and my response ended up sounding much too forceful. It wasn't my intent, and I should have given your reply the attention it deserved.
I don't. I said roughly the opposite of that; I've said that despite mainstream media losing its stranglehold on how people get their information, there still seems to be an effective method of controlling messaging.
All I said is that while it does still seem to be controlled, it is not "mainstream media". Nonetheless, I said that it seems like I agree with you, generally speaking. I think maybe we've gotten off on the wrong foot in this conversation; I feel like you're hearing a much more argumentative tone than I believe I'm projecting.
My disagreement (mostly) was with the comment I originally replied to, that asserted that policing, as it is practiced today, isn't a serious problem (which I disagree strongly with) and that mainstream media is the real problem (which I am somewhat in agreement with, but I think it's a more complex conversation than saying, "mainstream media is the problem").
Edit: And, on the "reply to deleted comment" thing, the comment existed when I wrote my comment. I believe I quoted enough context to continue the conversation. While I appreciate the sentiment of not starting flame wars, I didn't intend to start one with my comment; I was sincere in my desire to be concrete about what I was talking about when I say that social media can seemingly propagate an approved message as effectively as a well-behaved mainstream media.