Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But crappy sat network is better than no network. If I can build a log cabin 1000 miles from anywhere and access HN, or log into HN from my sailboat offshore, I will finally be able to never be productive from anywhere.


Yeah it should open out a whole new segment to consumer markets.

Free(but very slow) ad supported internet every where on earth.

Connection to the cloud for a million different kind of Internet-Of-Things class devices. I think this is pretty big as these devices consume very little data, but generally have issues getting connectively at all in some the more remote areas these things tend to get deployed. Think ocean current mappers, artic ice melting detectors, or a multitude of geo-sensors that would love to have a connection in extremely remote areas.

Satellite-based emergency beacon in every phone?

Slow but usable internet for remote villages. Pushing news, weather, education materials. Perhaps combined with solar power One Laptop Per Child class devices.


He's already stated that it won't be free and that the consumer base stations (using phased array antennas) will run from $100 to $300.


Free is subjective. They won't be free, but Google could subsidize stations and add ads.

IoT companies can create through own hardware and pay bulk rates.

Cellphone companies certainly have the option to get on the boat too, if the hardware necessary to communicate to satellites is small enough to go in a smart phone, as have the option to make an emergency call(or most likely SMS/Email) nearly anywhere in the world is a pretty killer feature.


Yes, obviously. The same is true of high latency networks, but that wasn't the point of the grandparent.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: