Writing a good comment takes effort. Interesting posts are upvoted just so that ...

robotnoises · on June 25, 2015

That makes sense. I guess I just assumed that the pattern would be more like this:

1.) See headline 2.) If the user enjoyed the read, they click upvote 3.) (Maybe) comment

What you are suggesting is that it's more like this:

1.) See headline 2.) Click upvote 3.) Read link 4.) (Maybe) comment

ad_hominem · on June 25, 2015

I think you misinterpreted what codegeek wrote.

People won't comment if they feel they don't have anything of substance to add - sometimes submissions can stand on their own pretty well and thus don't solicit a lot of comments. It's about maintaining a high signal-to-noise ratio. If anything I've found that you can use the karma/comment ratio as a moderately reliable indicator of link quality.

As for your original question, you should probably "lurk moar" before starting off-topic discussions. This really isn't that uncommon.

scott_s · on June 25, 2015

Not necessarily. codegeek's point holds for both patterns; it's a statement on upvoting a submission for potential discussion.