Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He has two really compelling pieces of (alleged) evidence: a new working piece of hardware and the fact that there were no written contracts.

That doesn't get them out of the woods legally, but if all TC has is incriminating snippets of email, it does make them more credible than TC.



The existence of the device is hardly evidence of who was responsible for creating it. The claim in question is that Arrington and crew contributed nothing to the piece of hardware in question. Michael Arrington could have built the entire thing by himself in his basement and the situation from our perspective would be the same as long as FG could get ahold of one of the devices.


I got the impression from Arrington's own writing that Fusion Garage was primarily responsible for the nuts-and-bolts tech.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: