Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What a nightmare. I think Digg v4 should have been launched as a separate startup, helmed by Kevin ala Pownce. It's just too different, and it looks like they may have killed the goose that laid the golden egg. What a disaster..


I'm not really sure how golden those eggs were, truth be told. Was digg profitable? How profitable? Not enough for a company that has taken in $40 million in VC money, for sure...


It could have been profitable if it wasn't. Up until recently Reddit was being run by only two or three engineers on a shoe-string budget. Digg had way too many employees, way too much ambition.


At one point they have SEVENTY people! That's pretty insane for what Digg is if you ask me.


Seventy paid (salaried) employees?


Instead of a separate startup (with a different brand/trade-dress) maybe a v4 as an opt-in alternative on a subdomain similar to what Facebook offered with lite.facebook.com would have been better received.

(Or alternatively v4 at digg.com and v3-features at discussion.digg.com with some tie-in.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: