Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Furthermore I would say this is actually a "feature", as some scripts might be too large to fit into limited memory, and also reading-and-executing one step at a time allows one to write "dynamic" scripts that are generated as they are executed.

Although I haven't written such "dynamic" scripts (yet), I'm sure a few exist that based on `expect` and `bash` work in a "feedback-loop" manner.



If you want to use a 'dynamic' script, why not pipe from stdin instead?


Yes, you are right, pipes are mandatory here.

When I was referring to a "dynamic" script I didn't mean "just append to a file", but instead I was referring to the fact that `bash` doesn't first try to load the whole script, parse and then execute it, but instead it "streams" through the script.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: